• This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.

Opinion on NEW Logo


#2
I would get rid of the texture and change the font for 'Graphics' and probably 'gibbons' too - but that's just my opinion.

The 'Graphics' looks quite unprofessional. I'd also ease the tracking for 'gibbons', it isn't very readable from your display pic
 
#4
Ok, Thanks guys for the constructive criticism, I will upload new improved attempts on this thread when I get the time. I would still like some more opinions please so keep then coming.
King Regards
Ben
 

Jimlad

Well-Known Member
#6
Keep cracking on at it. Logos tend to work best when kept simple. Ease up on the visual effects and try out some different fonts. :)
 
#8
I understand where all of you are coming from, would you be able to show some new concepts or ideas I could work from if you have some spare time please, don't worry if not, I am just very busy with school work and exams. You could obviously watermark them if you wish. I would just like some examples please. I would never copy them exactly because I want to improve my skills too! :D
 

Jimlad

Well-Known Member
#9
It all depends on what message you want to put across through your typeface really. For instance, a bold sans-serif font might imply strength and reliability (good for something like a construction company logo), whereas a slimmer serif font could suggest sophistication and extravagance (good for restaurant menus or wedding invitations).

Have a think about the message you want to put across, then if you're short on fonts head over to a font website (dafont.com has plenty for free) and you can type your name in and see it displayed in a myriad of different styles.

Try a few things out. But I'd advise against mixing serif with sans-serif, or square with rounded.
 
#12
Sorry about the quality, its shocking, will improve the quality when I have finalised my design. I uploaded the images from my phone, perhaps that's why the quality is bad :L sorry about that