I'm assuming he means the first...Sunburn said:If your referencing prefabs like monster-template.com well, they are good for inspiration i suppose at best, at worst they devalue the web design industry as a whole, as people who have no interest or time to understand what is a profession; force square peg projects in to round hole templates without consideration or thought or any understanding.
If your referencing to the process of templating then, this approach is highly useful and should be encouraged in the industry as it will save both time and development worries on a multipage site which shares the same layout.
CSparkes said:Coming from a past background of using the PSD's from templates only I have a mixed view.
As a business descion when i started out cost reduction without skimping is a huge part. When i was quoted but local designers around £7-800 for a 2/3 page design, homepage & content pages I have to take the choice that if I buy 3 templates at £30 that is only £90 and say 1-2 days at £160ish modifying them to get the design i want then that is much more wiser & cost effective, also means i can choose 3 designs that i want to go down the route of so not worrying id design comes back not how i want that i will have to spend evan more. Not all web designers are working for clients that have huge budgets so being able to offer a good design smart looking website in there budget = more business.
It is not till you find sites like these that you find freelancers that might be more competetive.
A web designer is in my view, the person that puts the site together with the help of a graphic designer to design the thing. My design skills are oksih, but far from great. I have never used a template as you buy it, always mod it and never ever use anything more than the PSD file. Always recut & code.
TBH, this is going to be a can of worms but that is my view. If I was working on a small site on a small budget with no chance of a designer being costed into it then I would still look at them.
Sunburn said:What ever floats your boat i suppose, for me I have spent much time learning the art and science of web development, so going down the template route is just an easy fast buck imho which doesn't give the client the best solution 99% of the time.
More importantly, by using prefabs your de-valuing the industry that a lot of people have spent a long time mastering.
Ultimately though its not about the individual its about the client, if your client is happy to have 2nd hand stuff which is likely to be shared with multiple clients / businesses then fair enough. Horses for courses and all that.
I would go as far as to say my client base wouldn't dare run the risk of their brand reputation on a pre-made solution and therefore see the true value in expertise that I and many others offer.
Personally I wouldn't be able to look my client in the face knowing I served them a 2nd hand product that somebody else has made and another company likely uses, just smacks of unprofessional.
Harry said:Bad move. Would you be happy if a builder pulled your extension off the back of a truck and charged you a full build?
Reusing templates means lack of consistency in code, lack of familiarisation with the code, and more importantly, lack of quality. It's also kinda dishonest too, you're getting paid to build a website, not getting paid to lift a generic template and resell it with a hefty markup.
Even from the business sense they're not useful. If you can't price a small project without resorting to templates then maybe you didn't ought to chase those projects at all.
My apologies for going on huge defense.Harry said:I wasn't aiming any of what I said at you, or what you said.
Yeh & i guess that would come under me as the Developer. This case was one of mine and as such when starting out self employed after leaving 6th form I had to look into this route to survive & bring in an income. Now i have had these clients and shown I have teh skills I now am in the position to have higher budgets & hire designers or use inhouse designers. All I am trying to portray is they ae good as a steoppng stone. Well for some, those who spend hours re-cutting & coding the templates so that as such they are only using the graphical design & not code.Harry said:Your point three is a good one, though. If a B&B came to me with a budget of £300 I'd probably turn them down. They can sort their own template out if they like, but I wouldn't give them one. I'm on about developers using templates, not other people.
Harry said:Bad move. Would you be happy if a builder pulled your extension off the back of a truck and charged you a full build?
Reusing templates means lack of consistency in code, lack of familiarisation with the code, and more importantly, lack of quality. It's also kinda dishonest too, you're getting paid to build a website, not getting paid to lift a generic template and resell it with a hefty markup.
Even from the business sense they're not useful. If you can't price a small project without resorting to templates then maybe you didn't ought to chase those projects at all.
jHouse said:I kinda disagree.
But first - how the fook would you drag an extension off the back of a truck??:lol:
jHouse said:I think you're getting paid to provide a website. The client may not care how you go about it.
Is it wrong to use Stock Photography? Why not take them yourself?? And its nothing to do with dishonesty. I mark up shed loads on hosting and stock stuff. Its business.
I do think its cheeky to use a template to showcase your skills. Showcase YOUR skills, not somebody elses.
Harry said:I wasn't aiming any of what I said at you, or what you said.
Your point three is a good one, though. If a B&B came to me with a budget of £300 I'd probably turn them down. They can sort their own template out if they like, but I wouldn't give them one. I'm on about developers using templates, not other people.