Again, no idea which part you're referring to - the whole thing, the 'B/3' shape, the text beside it?
Without context of the brief and the client and what they wanted, it's hard to critique.
You've shown something here that's impossible to critique or give feedback on because logos are driven by clients desires, none of which you've presented here.
Asking to rate it, we can only rate it on our own perception of what we think is good or bad.
I might say it's 1 out of 10, someone else might really like it and score it 9/10
But that's personal taste, and not related to judging a logo based on what problem it was supposed to solve.
If we had context then I might be able to say that you solved the clients problem perfectly, you executed what they wanted and solved their issue and I can then increase my rating to 8/10 or something.
But people in the business don't usually rate things out of 10 when it goes up to 11.
Anyway - getting off track here....
You need to provide context.
We don't score each others work - we discuss it openly and talk through the decision making process and directsion we might have taken to improve.
Logo creation is problem solving and execution.
Rating things out of 10 is just not a useful exercise and gives you no feedback other than personal like or dislike.