First I don't like the fact I have to go to behance to view the work... in fact it's actually breaking one of the
forum rules.
As to the work:
NC3C - doesn't read as acbc, the rest is just waffle and sticking the logo onto stock imagery/templates.
Giovane roma - you go on about the wolf, romulus and remus but the work you end up with has absolutely no relation to the wolf whatsoever.
Like hankscorpio, no idea what that text with the blue lines is for, if anything it's showing it's flaws with kerning etc.
I have zero idea why you've even focused on the two O's...
Talotta....oh look it's the English rose logo, sorry but at least on a UK forum that has too much reference to the red rose we use. Can't say I really like the overall flow of the rose and even if I remove the 'English rose' vibe I'd be thinking tattoo's before hair. It also looks very familiar.
Parsons...pretty sure I've seen that logo somewhere before and not just on a stock image
Ultimately and this goes for all of them, if we, as designers, can't understand the design without the explanations then there's no way a normal person is going to.
Side note... it's all very well you using stock imagery to show designs but personally I think you should state that you've used it and shouldn't be relying on it to 'bulk up' the work on the page