Okay Jazajay, you didn't take that one too well.
No as you are arguing my point is wrong when you cant back up why it is from official sources.
But I still don't get your point?
Your now agreeing I'm right but also disagreeing with me?
As what I put in my feedback follows Onartis example, and yours, which you agree with.
My point is that he had a h4 after a h1, in that situation it should be a h2,
outlined by the W3C, as I said, also that is what Onartis example says that you agree with?????
So what are you on about???
As in Onartis example, and the example you agree with, it does not include a h1 > h4 combination???? Slightly confused as to your first point then????
Again I'll quote the W3C's implied best guidelines ~
They accept H1 H2 H1 while they do not accept H1 H3 H1 since the heading level H2 is skipped.
Also their example is a h1 to h3 as bad practise, I picked up a h1 to h4 which is worse than the W3C's example????? Again confused to your original point?
Edit:
I may back down slightly on the address tag though.

Even though you clearly didn't read my thread properly before disagreeing.
Jaz