Business Cards.
- Thread starter ARRIVALS
- Start date
No 3 for me....
ARRIVALS
Well-Known Member
I preferred them, just not sure it needs the main logo/description on both sides.
Minuteman Press
Active Member
Yes, number three is nice.
Is the TM absolutely necessary?
Is the TM absolutely necessary?
Paul Murray
Ultimate Member
No. 3, the white type looks nice set against the yellow, but I'm not liking the space between the landline number and the mobile number.
I see what you mean about the branding on both sides but when you hand someone a card they'll only be looking at one side at a time so I don't think it's too much of a problem.
I see what you mean about the branding on both sides but when you hand someone a card they'll only be looking at one side at a time so I don't think it's too much of a problem.
ARRIVALS
Well-Known Member
Cheers guys.
With regards to the TM, whilst it's probably not necessary, it's something I've always done. With work for clients I put the TM on there, it's something 90% of them always ask me to do, so now it's just a habit!
It adds something a little interesting to a regular logotype, as well as a little security until the name/brand is officially registered. (which I havn't got round to doing yet)
With the space between the landline and mobile numbers, I wasn't keen on the 2 numbers being on separate lines, it moved that block of text too far up the card for my liking, so want to keep it on the same line. I did use 1 space after the landlane before the mobile but something wasn't right.
Maybe a - in between to separate them? I'll give it a go.
With regards to the TM, whilst it's probably not necessary, it's something I've always done. With work for clients I put the TM on there, it's something 90% of them always ask me to do, so now it's just a habit!
It adds something a little interesting to a regular logotype, as well as a little security until the name/brand is officially registered. (which I havn't got round to doing yet)
With the space between the landline and mobile numbers, I wasn't keen on the 2 numbers being on separate lines, it moved that block of text too far up the card for my liking, so want to keep it on the same line. I did use 1 space after the landlane before the mobile but something wasn't right.
Maybe a - in between to separate them? I'll give it a go.
Paul Murray
Ultimate Member
It could just be me being picky but my eye was drawn to the space :icon_smile:
A small adjustment to the letter-spacing could perhaps help reduce the gap?
A small adjustment to the letter-spacing could perhaps help reduce the gap?
Tony Hardy
Well-Known Member
I prefer number 2 out of all of them 
They're very snazzy. I like them a lot.
They're very snazzy. I like them a lot.
Tony Hardy
Well-Known Member
The second lot, sorry
ARRIVALS
Well-Known Member
Maybe it is. I'm fine with that though.:icon_cheers:
garywaiman
Member
I agree - number 2 from your second set of four. The extra space in the middle of the details looks a bit strange.
I find myself using the Thanks button in the same way as Facebook's Like button - damn Zuckerberg's social behemoth!
I find myself using the Thanks button in the same way as Facebook's Like button - damn Zuckerberg's social behemoth!
novasolution
New Member
No. 3 to me! It's very nice!
Squevasquidge
Member
Number 2 for me...
Labanbrown
New Member
Question is which one works hardest? That's the main objective. Business cards are powerful little things and done right can work wonder for your business..