That article backs up the earlier points raised, this isnt a logo, its a graphic device, used as a flag and a brand for the campaign.
Even when you check the design agency, Creative Concern, who delivered the job, it shows that they only ever used the text on its own as this makes a decent wordmark.
I cant find any evidence of this graphic ever being used as a logo. Sure, it was added to backgrounds on websites and letterheads, but its not a logo, its a graphic device.