If I am honest I much pefer their original, your's insn't bad it's just their's is stronger (to my eyes anyway). Could you not keep it more similar and kinda use thin white lines to connect the dots of the original? in other words practially identical apart from name change (same font) then join the dots?
...aso looks like you have a gradient / inner shadow to your's (tho could just be the res making it look that way)...if you do, do you really need to have it?
My instinct here would be to simplify the design to make it a bit more punchy. I agree with Tony's comment that the three lines on every dot is too much. Perhaps you only need to connect two dots - from corner to corner using a single, heavier line. Or maybe you could just connect the green dots?
I think it's a great start, but I agree with everyone else that the connecting lines are a bit OTT. Maybe try Turing your lines into solid shapes, make them semi transparent like glass or a motion blur - could even colour code them to the dots they join up.
I like MJ96's comment on staking the type like the original, but maybe try different locations in relation to the icon to mix it up from theirs.
All in all I like it though. You can see a strong connection with the original, but it's different enough to know that it relates to something different. :thumb:
the idea is nice, the final result isnt finished yet though i think.
id put the text under the logo, and with the lines id try looking at them either thinner or as a dotted line as at the moment i think the lines(probable cause of the thickness) messes it up a bit and makes it to much to look at. but the initial concept is good