Print Reseller Scheme
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Business Cards.

Discussion in 'Graphic Design & Logo Design Critique:' started by ARRIVALS, Sep 28, 2011.

  1. ARRIVALS

    ARRIVALS Well-Known Member

    I've rebranded myself, redesigned my website and redesigned my stationary. Problem is, I'm not sure which set of business cards to use.

    Any input would be cool.

    Cheers.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Stationery Direct

    Stationery Direct Administrator Staff Member

    No 3 for me....
     
  3. ARRIVALS

    ARRIVALS Well-Known Member

    I preferred them, just not sure it needs the main logo/description on both sides.
     
  4. Minuteman Press

    Minuteman Press Moderator

    Yes, number three is nice.

    Is the TM absolutely necessary?
     
  5. Paul Murray

    Paul Murray Moderator Staff Member

    No. 3, the white type looks nice set against the yellow, but I'm not liking the space between the landline number and the mobile number.

    I see what you mean about the branding on both sides but when you hand someone a card they'll only be looking at one side at a time so I don't think it's too much of a problem.
     
  6. ARRIVALS

    ARRIVALS Well-Known Member

    Cheers guys.

    With regards to the TM, whilst it's probably not necessary, it's something I've always done. With work for clients I put the TM on there, it's something 90% of them always ask me to do, so now it's just a habit!

    It adds something a little interesting to a regular logotype, as well as a little security until the name/brand is officially registered. (which I havn't got round to doing yet)

    With the space between the landline and mobile numbers, I wasn't keen on the 2 numbers being on separate lines, it moved that block of text too far up the card for my liking, so want to keep it on the same line. I did use 1 space after the landlane before the mobile but something wasn't right.

    Maybe a - in between to separate them? I'll give it a go.
     
  7. Paul Murray

    Paul Murray Moderator Staff Member

    It could just be me being picky but my eye was drawn to the space :icon_smile:

    A small adjustment to the letter-spacing could perhaps help reduce the gap?
     
  8. ARRIVALS

    ARRIVALS Well-Known Member

    Being picky is the sign of a good designer ;) I wasn't sure about it which was why I posted them here :D

    Have a look at these new ones.
     

    Attached Files:

  9. Tony Hardy

    Tony Hardy Well-Known Member

    I prefer number 2 out of all of them :)
    They're very snazzy. I like them a lot.
     
  10. ARRIVALS

    ARRIVALS Well-Known Member

    Cheers mate. Was that no.2 from the first 3, or the second 4?
     
  11. Tony Hardy

    Tony Hardy Well-Known Member

    The second lot, sorry :)
     
  12. ARRIVALS

    ARRIVALS Well-Known Member

    Thanks! :D
     
  13. Dave L

    Dave L Well-Known Member

    Looking good. I find the unregistered trademark thing a bit pretentious, though...
     
  14. ARRIVALS

    ARRIVALS Well-Known Member

    Maybe it is. I'm fine with that though.:icon_cheers:
     
  15. garywaiman

    garywaiman Member

    I agree - number 2 from your second set of four. The extra space in the middle of the details looks a bit strange.

    I find myself using the Thanks button in the same way as Facebook's Like button - damn Zuckerberg's social behemoth!
     
  16. novasolution

    novasolution New Member

    No. 3 to me! It's very nice!
     
  17. ARRIVALS

    ARRIVALS Well-Known Member

    Cheers for the feedback guys. :icon_thumbup:
     
  18. Squevasquidge

    Squevasquidge Member

    Number 2 for me... :)
     
  19. Labanbrown

    Labanbrown New Member

    Question is which one works hardest? That's the main objective. Business cards are powerful little things and done right can work wonder for your business..
     

Share This Page