Quality stock photos for your creative or marketing needs. Photolibrary - We Get It


Graphic Design Forums: UK forums for graphic designers » Graphic Design Forums: » Printing & Print Design Forum: » Designers!

Reply
Old 03-16-2010, 08:03 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 177
Thanks: 15
Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts
Default Designers!

This is a question posed about your methods of designing for print. I receive quite a number of jobs where I work that are set this way:

Say Quark/InDesign - the designer has set their page larger than the finished size, then put crop marks around it within the artboard. Why do you do this, when it makes more sense to create your artboard the correct size to begin with, and add your crops either using the appropriate tools (adding slug area and drawing them on there or whatever), or as you PDF it? (I had a job today set up this way, with wonky drawn crop marks, then it had been PDF'd with crop marks, it made no sense to me).

I am curious as to whether there's a good reason for this? It can be frustrating at times to have to sort it out!
I work as a graphic designer/pre press, and don't set up my artwork like this, I use the correct artboard size, and PDF with crop marks and bleed etc.

Thanks for your replies!
LovesPrint is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on FacebookStumble this Post!Twit this!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2010, 09:30 PM   #2
Moderator
 
Minuteman Press's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 1,136
Thanks: 165
Thanked 141 Times in 124 Posts
Default

I think as I understand the question - it's what you are used to. By doing it in this way you clearly see the bleed off / where the bleed is needed / how the finished result will look.

Keeps you mindful of the bleed.
__________________
Peter Wise MA FRGS FCIM DipM
minutemanbristol.com Testimonials
You should follow me on Twitter here
Minuteman Press is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on FacebookStumble this Post!Twit this!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:27 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 177
Thanks: 15
Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minuteman Press View Post
I think as I understand the question - it's what you are used to. By doing it in this way you clearly see the bleed off / where the bleed is needed / how the finished result will look.

Keeps you mindful of the bleed.
Thanks for your reply!

If you set your document up correctly, you can see where the bleed will be - for example in CS4 Illustrator, like InDesign has had for ages, you now have an option to put the bleed onto your document, so your guidelines are there, and it's clearly marked out. I completely can see how your answer makes sense if you are used to using Quark or something though, which doesn't have those guidelines.

It just seems like the software isn't being used to it's full advantage. If it's what people are used to it's fair enough, but at the same time a shame, doing something "because you've always done it that way" is limiting.
LovesPrint is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on FacebookStumble this Post!Twit this!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Flyer Printing | Print Reseller Scheme | Graphic Design | Logo Designer | Web Design UK | Graphic Design UK | Letterhead Printing
Business Card Printing | UK Business Forum | Logo Designer | NCR Pads | NCR Books | Receipt Books | Drinks Coasters | A6 Flyers | A5 Leaflets
Web Design & Development | vBulletin Skins | Small Business Websites | Leaflets | Leaflet Printing | Web Design Liverpool | Invoice Books


DISCLAIMER: All posts on this forum express the views and opinions of the author only, not the owners, staff or advertisers, hence we will not be held liable.


Powered by vBulletin®
© Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.