Recent content by Romack

It's a nice site to look at, your boasting throughout the copy kind of puts me off.

My only vice is that the ink droplets defy gravity. Otherwise it's a nice style and creative.

second one

I've just submitted a better design...

just a bit boring, generic layout, pastel colours, safe fonts, green on green, no distinction between text and headers. Yawn.

Readin the 'i' newspaper you may see this beauty... St Ryde - Webfont & Desktop font MyFonts

i hate the font, great and fat. I wish it had buttons, instead of just text links, and the text links are too close together. I also think the portfolio link is awesome, it moves the page that tiny bit so i don't have to. Otherwise the layout reminds me of Armadillo Creative's site. Just my...

yeah, gotham is 'in'

It's alright, seems a bit washed out to be honest. Not gonna attract much attention. And i see no resemblance between image and text, other than that they are both drawn. Looks like a cover for a Folk act. YAWN.

it might look better with the symbol above the text rather than preceding it

Forget the Fold, it's a website not a newspaper! If your website is informative and/or well designed, the user WILL scroll for more.

nah, it looks nice clean, buttons are fine

Also if your black is | C:0% | M:0% | Y:0% | K:100% you won't get a 'full' black. Try making it Registration Black

Personally I would only use After Effects for video processing. If you're wanting to create Flash files, use Flash. After Effects isn't designed to create interactive elements.

it has no noticeable structure. It's very white without any kind of visual boundaries to separate hierarchy. Basically it looks half finished. The top half is too big and and the circle graphic on the right cuts of... it looks untidy. The icons need a rollover state and also line up with...