IPO changes 'shameful' logo

[Eagle]

The Intellectual Property Office used to have such a god-awful logo that I recently felt compelled to write to them and ask just what they were thinking?; did they not think that their logo was a tad... "uncreative" and "non-innovative"...

It seems they listened - but alas, I never got the gig. Probably because I also said: 'are you taking the piss?'

Now, I just wonder how much they paid for the new one? Probably tens of thousands, I'll bet. It's a fine logo, don't get me wrong - but I would question the spacing and overall arrangement - it lets it down badly. :icon_thumbdown:

[Helen]

What the hell! What an utter pile of crud! It looks all wrong!

[Minuteman Press]

At least they can be sure that nobody will copy it!

[LovesPrint]

Not a fan I have to say, as the spacing on the lettering is awful, and the graphic says 'underwater sea king' (think little mermaid) to me, rather than intellectual.

[Eagle]

Art is subjective.

[Pixels Ink]

Did you ever get a reply to your e-mail Mark?

[Eagle]

No. However, the next day, two tall gentlemen wearing black suits and sunglasses did visit me. They said they were sent to tell me that everything was "on schedule".

I didn't understand what they meant of course and thought nothing of it. Probably just CleanE-Z reps or something. I must say; they're looking smart these days.