| View Poll Results: Quark or InDesign? | |||
| Die hard Qxp fan - Never going to switch |
   
|
0 | 0% |
| Want to switch to Indi but need the funds |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Sold my soul to Adobe |
  
|
10 | 100.00% |
| Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
08-11-2009, 03:54 PM
|
#11 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London / U.K.
Posts: 181
Thanks: 6
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
I've always hated Quark and it's ability to never quite be as good as InDesign.
Unfortunately however, the 2 main jobs I've had have both been Quark users. I've always had to get my Adobe kicks from my freelance work. Still, that's better than nothing :) /Doug
__________________
design-is.co.uk - freelance projects dougbarned.co.uk - personal site & blog - twitter feralinteractive.com - designer day job - twitter - facebook |
||
|
       
|
|
08-11-2009, 05:15 PM
|
#12 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 107
Thanks: 2
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
I believe Quark is still the editorial design tool of choice. Indesign has taken the corporate and institutional publishing market, because its work flow is better and, frankly, because it's easier to use. It lacks Quark's flexibility, though, and publishers still expect Quark.
At least that's what my wife tells me and she is, of course, always right, except when I'm wrong. |
||
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
